Knowledge Management Environments

DCIS 735
Spring 2008 Cluster
March 7 - August 6, 2008


Instructor
Timothy Ellis, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Address:
Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences
3301 College Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314

Phone numbers:
(954)262-2029
(800)986-2247, ext. 2029
Fax: (954)262-3915

E-mail: ellist@nova.edu

  Syllabus Contents
Class Location and Format
Online, Cluster format

Course Description    TOP

Knowledge Management (KM) is said to promote innovation, improve efficiency and effectiveness, and provide a sustainable competitive advantage in today's global environment. This course examines computer-based systems for supporting KM. Principles of developing systems for "knowledge management" are explored. System architectures, tools and techniques and their use in capturing, storing, locating, evaluating, disseminating, and using information and knowledge are examined. Application of these principles and techniques through the use of rapidly evolving information/communication technologies is studied in the context of their impact on organizations. Topics include techniques for KB design, knowledge integration, indexing, searching, retrieving and displaying information from knowledge bases. This course will Investigate the issues in the application of knowledge management to organizational learning and decision-making.

This course explores the emergence of Knowledge Management in capturing, organizing and managing organizational knowledge. Students will investigate the theoretical, conceptual, organizational, and technical framework of implementing and using KM to support the use of organizational knowledge. The basic technology and implications of KM will be explored, including issues such as knowledge acquisition and organizational learning technologies, the Internet and the Web as a knowledge source, cooperation and teamwork, asynchronous/synchronous communication tools, methods of developing, indexing and searching knowledge bases.

Required Text    TOP

None. Current research literature will be used.

Recommended supplemental text:

SCIS Dissertation Guide

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Fifth Edition. American Psychological Association, July 2001.
ISBN: 1-55798-791-2 (or current version)

Required Software    TOP

None

Exit Competencies    TOP

By the end of the course, the student will be able to:

  1. Identify and analyze the existing body of research concerning the development and use of knowledge management applications.
  2. Synthesize that existing research into support for new areas for investigation.
  3. Develop the structure for original research into the roles and functions in knowledge management environments.
  4. Function as a peer in a research team.

Participation in this course places some rather extra-ordinary demands on the student. In specific, students will be expected to:

  1. Work within a team environment
  2. At the same time, however, accept responsibility for self and produce an original work that is preponderantly the result of her or his individual efforts.
  3. Participate in the evaluation of her or his peers.
  4. Accept peer evaluation as an element in grade determination.

Course Outline and Assignments    TOP

There are five types of assignments you will do in this course: knowledge-base development, research problem exploration, team-based analysis of the literature, collaboration reflection, and a term journal. A description of each assignment type follows. Be sure to include a cover page that includes the title of the document, assignment title, the student's name, e-mail address, and date of submission.

As detailed in the Due Dates section, this assignment must be submitted (post-marked) no later than 11:55 PM Eastern time on the day specified in the assignment due date on the class schedule. NOTE – WebCT sometimes marks entries as LATE. Do not be concerned if you get the work in on time. I will determine when work is late.

As a graduate student you are expected to be proficient in the use of the English language. Errors in grammar, spelling, or syntax will affect your grade. As your professor, I will not provide remedial help for writing problems. If you are unable to write clearly and correctly, I urge you to contact the program office for sources of remedial help.

The course schedule provides specific due dates for all assignments.

Knowledge-Base Development    TOP

  1. A total of 45 points can be earned in this assignment. Fifteen (15) points for each of the three (3) topics.
  2. All contributions must be made in the class discussion pages under the applicable knowledge-base topic.
  3. It is not good to have erroneous or a knowledge that is not consistent. Therefore, the knowledge base postings will be reviewed to insure the post conforms to the assignment and focuses on the knowledge topic being built. Postings that do not present the specifics of the assignment will be deleted and the student notified.
  4. Assignment specifics. There will be two types of entries you will need to make in the dedicated WebCT discussion forum area for each of the three topics
    1. Initiate the review of an article (one entry per knowledge-base assignment
      1. Select an article from a current, peer-reviewed journal or conference proceeding 
      2. The article you select cannot, of course, already have been reviewed by another student in the class
      3. Write a scholarly, 3 – 5 paragraph annotated bibliography entry for the article
        1. Identify and discuss those points you found of greatest potential research interest in the article
        2. Do not just summarize the article
      4. Format for posting
        1. Subject line should be a complete citation for the article in APA format
        2. First line in the body of the posting should start with the word ÒKeywordsÓ, followed by a list of what you consider the keywords for the article to be, based on the points of interest you noted in the article (Note: do not just copy the keywords from the article
        3. Attach a copy of the article in .pdf format to your posting
    2. Analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the articles posted by the other students
      1. Since each person might well find different points of interest in the same article, it is of value to have articles reviewed by multiple reviewers.
      2. You will need to complete the Web-form located at http://scisalliance/ellist/Knowledge/Evaluator.cfm for each article posted in each knowledge base, except for the article you post yourself.

Topic

Start

End

Use of technology in KM

3/10/08

4/6/08

Problems inherent in KM implementation (Horror stories)

4/7/08

5/4/08

Best practices in KM implementation (Success stories)

5/5/08

6/1/08

Research Problem Exploration    TOP

  1. This assignment is worth 60 points.
  2. In the assignment, you will identify and explore a potential research area within the knowledge management domain.
  3. Follow the format and content specified in the Problem Explication worksheet available in the Course Documents section of the courseÕs WebCT site.

Revising the Knowledge Base   TOP

  1. This is a team-based assignment is worth 50 points
  2. The goal for the assignment is to produce a group review of the literature based upon one of the three knowledge-bases developed earlier in the course.
  3. Each student will be assigned to one of three teams. Each team will be responsible for developing a review of the literature of one of three KM domain knowledge bases. The three knowledge-base topics are:
    1. Use of technology to promote knowledge management
    2. Problems inherent in knowledge management implementation
    3. Best practices in knowledge management implementation
  4. Follow the format for the review of the literature contained in the GSCIS Dissertation Guide. Follow the processes for analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of the literature detailed in the article entitled ÒA Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems ResearchÓ available in the Course Documents section of the courseÕs WebCT site.
  5. If the team would like to submit the revised knowledge base in a format other than the prescribed review of the literature, the team should forward a proposal for the alternative submission format to the instructor no later than two weeks subsequent to the formation of the team.

Collaboration Reflection    TOP

  1. This assignment is worth 25 points.
  2. As detailed in the Due Dates section, the deliverables associated with this assignment must be submitted no later than 11:55 pm Fort Lauderdale (Eastern) time on the Sunday of the week due.
  3. This assignment is actually a continuation of the Team Project assignment in which you will have the opportunity to reflect on the work of your team as a whole and on each team member.
  4. In this assignment you will be responsible for:
    1. Describing your team and the collaborative process you experienced.
    2. Evaluating the functioning of your team as a whole.
    3. Evaluating the performance of each member of your team (including yourself).
  5. You will use the rating scale available in the Collaboration Reflection Template document posted in the Course Documents section of the courseÕs WebCT site.
  6. Be sure to support your evaluation ratings with data.
    1. Please note, your data might well be both quantitative and qualitative.
    2. Be sure to present and analyze each type of data in a manner consistent with reporting the results of scholarly research.
  7. These papers should be no longer than five (5) double-spaced pages and are to be submitted in the appropriate queue in the Assignment Dropbox area of the course's Web CT site.
  8. The SCIS Dissertation Guide and the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (Fifth Edition) should be used as guides for form, style, and general writing principles in the preparation of the resource packs.
  9. As a graduate student you are expected to be proficient in the use of the English language. Errors in grammar, spelling, or syntax will affect your grade. As your professor, I will not provide remedial help for writing problems. If you are unable to write clearly and correctly, I urge you to contact the program office for sources of remedial help.

Term Journal      TOP

  1. The Term Journal is worth 20 points for the term.
  2. This assignment provides the opportunity for you to reflect on your work in the course. You will be responsible for developing a comprehensive evaluation of your learning experience in the course.
  3. Although the exact contents and structure of the Term Journal may well vary from student to student, it should include:
    1. An evaluation of how well you met the learning outcomes identified for the course and how effective the assignments were in promoting attainment of those outcomes for you.
    2. Be sure to support your evaluation with data. Please note, your data might well be both quantitative and qualitative. Be sure to present and analyze each type of data in a manner consistent with reporting the results of scholarly research.
  4. This paper should be no longer than five (5) double-spaced pages and is to be submitted in the appropriate queue in the Assignment Dropbox area of the course's Web CT site.
  5. The SCIS Dissertation Guide and the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (Fifth Edition) should be used as guides for form, style, and general writing principles in the preparation of the resource packs.
  6. As a graduate student you are expected to be proficient in the use of the English language. Errors in grammar, spelling, or syntax will affect your grade. As your professor, I will not provide remedial help for writing problems. If you are unable to write clearly and correctly, I urge you to contact the program office for sources of remedial help.

Course Schedule:     TOP

Week
Week Ending Knowledge Base Development Problem Exploration Revised Knowledge Base (Team Project) Collaboration Reflection Term Journal
1
3/16/08 Effective use of technology in KM        
2
3/23/08        
3
3/30/08        
4
4/6/08        
5
4/13/08 Problems inherent in KM implementation        
6
4/20/08    
 
7
4/27/08        
8
5/4/08        
9
5/11/08 Best practices in KM implementation Report Due      
10
5/18/08        
11
5/25/08        
12
6/1/08   Preference Surveys    
13
6/8/08     Teams Formed    
14
6/15/08     Resource Pack Due    
15
6/22/08        
16
6/29/08        
17
7/6/08        
18
7/13/08        
19
7/20/08        
20
7/27/08        
21
8/3/08       Report Due  
22
8/6/08         Report Due

 

 Grading Criteria   TOP

Evaluating doctoral-level work is quite different from evaluating undergraduate or even masters-level work. At this level, simple mastery of the course content is not adequate; you must also demonstrate the capacity to conduct research in the discipline and make an original contribution. For the purposes of this course, the following will be the "working definition" of doctoral-level scholarship:

  1. Well written
    1. Absence of grammatical errors
    2. Correct word selection and usage
    3. Logically organized
    4. Material synthesized into a smoothly-flowing discussion
  2. Well researched
    1. Peer-reviewed sources
    2. Current literature
    3. Evidence of analysis of the material
    4. Evidence of evaluation of the material
  3. Factually sound
    1. Clear distinction between opinion, theory, and fact
    2. Essential elements identified
    3. Zero factual errors
  4. Demonstrates a potential for original work through
    1. Analysis
    2. Synthesis
    3. Evaluation

Granularity in evaluation is very difficult when reviewing doctoral-level work. There are a great many ways in which an assignment can demonstrate mastery at the doctoral level. In general, I find the following descriptors and grading categories to be the most meaningful:

Fully meets expectations for doctoral work                   100% of points possible
Meets expectations with only minor exceptions              90% of points possible
Meets expectations with major exceptions                      80% of points possible
Significant exceptions to expectations                            70% of points possible
Does not meet expectations for doctoral work               0 points

Assignment Value Recap

Assignment

  Points

Knowledge Base Development

45

Research Problem Exploration

60

Knowledge Base Revision

50

Collaborative Reflection

25

Term Journal

20

TOTAL

200

Grade Calculation

Letter Grade

Points Earned

A

185 or more

A-

180 -184

 B+

176 - 179

B

165 - 178

B-

160 - 164

 C+

156 - 159

C

146 - 155

F

Fewer than 146

Incompletes WILL NOT be given except under circumstances of extreme hardship. Please refer to the SCIS Graduate Catalog for details on the Incomplete policy.

NOTE: All course communication should be through the class forum for help and the WebCT e-mail system.

Class/Course Rules    TOP

Due Dates   

The preponderance of the learning that you will experience in this course will be through a learning-by-doing process. This process has been widely accepted in the adult education literature as preferable to the more traditional, classroom-bound, didactic lecture format. Research has shown that most of us 'older learners' seem to do better when we are actively involved in the process.

The learning-by-doing process does, however, require time. The student must retrieve, experiment with, analyze, and assimilate a great deal of information in order to meet the learning objectives for the course. The retrieval, experimentation, analysis, and assimilation can only be done over the course of time. There truly is no way to cram that process into an 'all-nighter'.

The assignments in this course are designed to direct you to the important concepts inherent in this subject matter. The schedule of due dates is designed to offer the pacing necessary for you to be able to actually retrieve, experiment with, analyze, and assimilate these concepts. The schedule does, in fact, set the environment in which the learning-by-doing process can occur.

Timeliness of submissions is an essential ingredient in the learning necessary for successful completion of this course. I do understand that you all must balance accomplishing academic requirements with family and work responsibilities. You have, however, made a commitment to pursuing this academic endeavor, and can not successfully do so if you do not allocate appropriate time to the process. All work is due by 11:55 pm Fort Lauderdale (Eastern) time on the day indicated in the assignment schedule. I normally download all assignmnets in the morning of the Monday following the due date. Any work submitted by the time I download the assignments for evaluation will be accepted as a timely submission; no work will be accepted after the time I download the assignments from ESET. Work submitted late will not be evaluated and will receive a grade of zero (0).

Incompletes are granted only under circumstances of extreme hardship. Please see the SCIS incomplete policy.

School and University Policies and Procedures: TOP
Students must comply with the policies published in the school’s Graduate Catalog and the NSU Student Handbook, some of which are included or referenced below. The catalog is at http://www.scis.nova.edu/NSS/pdf_documents/Catalog.pdf. The handbook is at http://www.nova.edu/cwis/studentaffairs/forms/ustudenthandbook.pdf

Academic Integrity    TOP

For the university-wide policy on academic standards, see the section Code of Student Conduct and Academic Responsibility in the NSU Student Handbook. Also see the section Student Misconduct in the GSCIS catalog. Each student is responsible for maintaining academic integrity and intellectual honesty in his or her academic work. It is the policy of the school that each student must:

Crediting the Words or Ideas of Others

When using the exact words of another, quotation marks must be used for short quotations (fewer than 40 words), and block quotation style must be used for longer quotations. In either case, a proper citation must also be provided. The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Fifth Edition, (2001, pp. 117 and 292) contains standards and examples on quotation methods.

When paraphrasing (summarizing, or rewriting) the words or ideas of another, a proper citation must be provided. (The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2001) contains standards and examples of citation methods (pp. 207–214) and reference lists (pp. 215–281)). The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1993) defines paraphrase:

An expression in other words, usually fuller and clearer, of the sense of a written or spoken passage or text…Express the meaning (of a word, phrase, passage, or work) in other words, usually with the object of clarification…

Changing word order, deleting words, or substituting synonyms is not acceptable paraphrasing—it is plagiarism, even when properly cited. Rather than make changes of this nature, the source should be quoted as written.

Original Work

Assignments, exams, projects, papers, theses, dissertations, etc., must be the original work of the student. Original work may include the thoughts and words of another author but such thoughts or words must be identified utilizing quotation marks or indentation and must properly identify the source. At all times, students are expected to comply with the school’s accepted citation practice and policy.

Work is not original when it has been submitted previously by the author or by anyone else for academic credit. Work is not original when it has been copied or partially copied from any other source, including another student, unless such copying is acknowledged by the person submitting the work for credit at the time the work is being submitted, or unless copying, sharing, or joint authorship is an express part of the assignment. Exams and tests are original work when no unauthorized aid is given, received, or used before or during the course of the examination, reexamination, and/or remediation.


Course Deliverable Contents    TOP

Submission instructions    TOP

Work must be submitted in the manner detailed for the specific type of assignment in the assignments section. If you have difficulty submitting work through either the ESET system or the Student Forums, contact the SCIS technical support center.

Writing Skills   TOP

Students must demonstrate proficiency in the use of the English language. Grammatical errors, spelling errors, and writing that fails to express ideas clearly will affect their grades and the completion of their academic programs. The faculty will not provide remedial help concerning grammatical errors or other writing difficulties. It is the student’s responsibility to proofread and edit his or her work which, in both form and content, should be letter-perfect. Work that is not properly edited will be rejected. It is university policy that students must submit their own work, not that of another person. Consequently, they should refrain from using outside editors to redo their work.

Disabilities and ADA TOP

NSU complies with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). The university’s detailed policy on disabilities is contained in the NSU Student Handbook. Student requests for accommodation based on ADA will be considered on an individual basis. Each student with a disability should discuss his or her needs with the GSCIS disability service representative, Candy Fish (call 954-262-2034, or email fishc@nova.edu) before the commencement of classes if possible.

Communication by Email TOP

Students must use their NSU email accounts when sending email to faculty and staff and must clearly identify their names and other appropriate information, e.g., course or program. When communicating with students via email, faculty and staff members will send mail only to NSU email accounts using NSU-recognized usernames. Students who forward their NSU-generated email to other email accounts do so at their own risk. GSCIS uses various course management tools that use private internal email systems. Students enrolled in courses using these tools should check both the private internal email system and NSU’s regular email system. NSU offers students web-based email access. Students are encouraged to check their NSU email account daily.


The Temporary Grade of Incomplete  TOP 

The temporary grade of Incomplete (I) will be granted only in cases of extreme hardship. Students do not have a right to an incomplete, which may be granted only when there is evidence of just cause. A student desiring an incomplete must submit a written appeal to the course professor at least two weeks prior to the end of the term. In the appeal, the student must: (1) provide a rationale; (2) demonstrate that he/she has been making a sincere effort to complete the assignments during the term; and (3) explain how all the possibilities to complete the assignments on time have been exhausted. Should the course professor agree, an incomplete contract will be prepared by the student and signed by both student and professor. The incomplete contract must contain a description of the work to be completed and a timetable. The completion period should be the shortest possible. In no case may the completion date extend beyond 30 days from the last day of the term for master’s courses or beyond 60 days from the last day of the term for doctoral courses. The incomplete contract will accompany the submission of the professor’s final grade roster to the program office. The program office will monitor each incomplete contract. If a change-of-grade form is not submitted by the scheduled completion date, the grade will be changed automatically from I to F. No student may graduate with an I on his or her record.

Grade Policy Regarding Withdrawals TOP

Course withdrawal requests must be submitted to the program office in writing by the student. Requests for withdrawal must be received by the program office by the calendar midpoint of the course (see dates in the academic calendar in the catalog and program brochures or at: http://www.scis.nova.edu/NSS/pdf_documents/AcadCal.pdf). Withdrawals sent by email must be sent from the student’s assigned NSU email account. Requests for withdrawal received after 11:59 p.m. EST on the withdrawal deadline date will not be accepted. Failure to attend class or participate in course activities will not automatically drop or withdraw a student from the class or the university. Students who have not withdrawn by the withdrawal deadline will receive letter grades that reflect their performance in the course. When a withdrawal request is approved, the transcript will show a grade of W (Withdrawn) for the course. Students with four withdrawals will be dismissed from the program. Depending on the date of withdrawal, the student may be eligible for a partial refund (see the appropriate catalog section Refund Policy Regarding Withdrawals).

Acceptable Use of Computing Resources TOP

Students must comply with the university’s Policy on Acceptable Use of Computing Resources (see NSU Student Handbook).

Academic Progress, Grade Requirements, and Academic Standing TOP

Students must be familiar with the school’s policy which is contained in its catalog.

Student Research Involving Human Subjects TOP

Students must be familiar with the university’s policy (see paragraph in catalog).

Responsibility for Payment of Tuition and Fees

Once registered, students are personally responsible for the payment of their tuition and fees.  Returned checks, cancelled credit cards, employer or agency refusal to pay, ineligibility for financial aid, and other reasons for non-payment may result in a direct bill to the student, and/or referral to a collection agency.

Payment and refund policies are based on the view that a student registering for a class is reserving a place in that class and that tuition and fees cover the opportunity to secure that place in the class. Since no other person can purchase that place, the student is responsible for the tuition and fees associated with it.  Simply not attending does not constitute a reason for non-payment.